HyFIVE

Port Decarbonization

Port decarbonization refers to the process of reducing and ultimately eliminating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other pollutants associated with port operations, maritime logistics, and onshore infrastructure. As critical nodes in global supply chains, ports are both contributors to and enablers of the energy transition. Decarbonizing ports is essential for achieving climate neutrality in the maritime sector and creating sustainable coastal environments.

Port decarbonization involves multiple strategies, including the adoption of renewable energy, clean fuels, electrification, digital optimization, and collaboration across value chains.

Why is port decarbonization important?

Ports are major sources of local and global emissions due to:

  • Vessel emissions while at berth (auxiliary engines, boilers),

  • Cargo handling equipment running on diesel or natural gas,

  • On-road freight traffic entering and leaving terminals,

  • Buildings and facilities with fossil-based heating or cooling,

  • Industrial activities located within or near port zones.

Decarbonizing ports contributes to:

  • Mitigating climate change, by cutting CO₂ and methane emissions,

  • Improving air quality, reducing pollutants like NOₓ, SOₓ, and particulate matter,

  • Public health and environmental justice, particularly in port-adjacent communities,

  • Enhancing port competitiveness and future-proofing infrastructure,

  • Complying with international and regional regulations (e.g., Fit for 55, FuelEU Maritime).

Key decarbonization strategies

  1. Onshore Power Supply (OPS)
    Also known as cold ironing or shore-to-ship power, OPS allows vessels to shut down their onboard generators while docked and connect to the local electric grid—ideally powered by renewable sources. OPS significantly reduces air pollution and noise.

  2. Electrification of port equipment
    Transitioning diesel-powered equipment—such as cranes, terminal tractors, and forklifts—to battery-electric or hybrid systems lowers GHG and pollutant emissions while improving energy efficiency.

  3. Renewable energy integration
    Installing solar panels, wind turbines, or energy storage systems on port premises helps ports meet energy needs sustainably and reduces dependence on fossil fuels.

  4. Alternative fuels infrastructure
    Developing bunkering capacity for LNG, biofuels, green ammonia, e-methanol, and hydrogen enables the decarbonization of the maritime sector beyond the port boundary.

  5. Green corridors and digital optimization
    Coordinating with shipping lines and other ports to establish green shipping corridors, including digital solutions for just-in-time arrivals, optimized routing, and port call efficiency, reduces waiting times and emissions at sea and at berth.

  6. Sustainable transport connections
    Encouraging the use of rail and inland waterways instead of trucks, and deploying zero-emission trucks, helps lower the carbon footprint of hinterland logistics.

  7. Energy efficiency in buildings and operations
    Implementing energy-efficient lighting, heating, cooling, and smart grid technologies across port buildings and terminals supports broader decarbonization goals.

Policy and regulatory drivers

Port decarbonization is increasingly supported and mandated by regional and international regulations:

  • FuelEU Maritime: Requires ships to reduce the GHG intensity of onboard energy and use OPS in core EU ports from 2030.

  • EU ETS (Maritime): Includes emissions from ships at berth in EU ports starting in 2024.

  • Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR): Mandates the deployment of OPS and alternative fuel bunkering infrastructure at EU ports.

  • IMO GHG Strategy: Encourages member states to support shore-based infrastructure for low- and zero-emission fuels.

Challenges

Despite the growing momentum, ports face several barriers to decarbonization:

  • High capital costs for electrification and OPS deployment.

  • Grid constraints in accessing sufficient renewable electricity.

  • Coordination complexity among diverse stakeholders (port authorities, shipping lines, terminal operators, energy providers).

  • Space and layout limitations for installing new infrastructure.

Uncertain fuel pathways in the global maritime sector, affecting long-term investment decisions.